Χρήστης:Leonidasppp/πρόχειρο

This proposal is about the classification of the simplest singular theoretical points on a hypothetic surface C (all bargaining behaviors) that do not depend on the orientation of C in space. This scientific proposal, once recorded as such, classified and analyzed a number of other theories and models, tried to put down a "new" concept of an alternative approach of "socio-economic welfare" for the sole purpose to demonstrate that it is possible a new tri- polar concerning instead of bipolar crumbling over time, producing increasingly more injustice, inequality, misery, depression This is able a. By defining and analyzing the set theory(Cantor and Zemelo-, agency theory and the bargaining Nash theory , , , b. By demonstrating and analyzing the incompatibilities of 5 famous theorems ant 3 theories ▲ It is a set theory (or an application of the set theory) because it is included in SET THEORY: Set theory is the mathematical theory of well-determined collections, called sets, of objects that are called members, or elements, of the set. Pure set theory deals exclusively with sets, so the only sets under consideration are those whose members are also sets.

it also  obeys in the axioms of extensionality, regularity (also called the Axiom of foundation), schema of specification (also called the axiom schema of separation or of restricted comprehension), pairing,  union schema of replacement infinity power set Well-ordering theorem The theory of "win-win-win” is included in the in ZFC set theory because it obeys the basic axioms of ZFC Set Theory (Axiom of extensionality, Axiom of regularity (also called the Axiom of foundation), Axiom schema of specification (also called the axiom schema of separation or of restricted comprehension), Axiom of pairing Axiom of union Axiom schema of replacement Axiom of infinity Axiom of power set Well-ordering theorem   

The win-win-win papakonstantinidis model, consists from discrete and indepented “parts” with indepented will and way of thinking These are fundamental perquisites of a SET From this point of view, win-win-win theory may be seen as “agency theory”, in the frame of “SET theory” (Cantor) (ZFC) : The concept here is that the "set theory" deals with sets which informally are collections of objects. Any type of object can be collected into a set From this point of view, the win-win-win perception includes “sets of behaviors” that obey in common rules (axioms)

It is an “Agency Theory” (or an application of the agency theory) because the individual must go beyond narrow personal interest and thought about the man who is to him and negotiates with him. This is the core of the suggestion Due to agency theory win-win-win papakonstantinidis “theory” help the researchers and University students to think twice (a) as the principle and (b) as agent of the whole community so to win So, “agency theory” introduces us to the double thinking leading thus, in limit, to a triple pole win (win-win-win) Furthermore, the "agency theory" produces “behaviors” of a double direction: one for him/her/self and the other for the "principle" The third part of negotiations (even under-informed) can induce the other party to reveal their information. They can provide a menu of choices in such a way that the choice depends on the private information of the other party .

It is finally bargaining theory (or an application of bargaining theory) as it relates to each infinitesimal agreement or disagreement that people have when dealing with each other and produce results fairly, or (most times) unjustly and even inequalities The aim of this theoretical contribution (if it exists) is to highlight the "SENSITIZATION ability" that everyone of us either relates to refugees, or in countries, whether in claiming or even in our daily transactions It is time to stop looking only personal interest or “individual defense”

In particular, the proposal deals with the collecting, classifying and comparing the theoretical material from various sources on the functioning of Social Welfare Function (SWF), towards building a strong case with logical and coherent arguments, towards the one Triple Pole (A-B-COMMUNITY) Equilibrium (TPE), different from N.E, that leads to the Social Bargaining Solution” (SBS) and coincide with the "optimal" Community Collective Choice (CCC) in order to create a highly versatile tool, “the win-win-win papakonstantinidis model” of well-formed formulas (wffs), Based on this model, in practical level, the ambitious is to create a series of new policies to strengthen social welfare, despite the "impossibility theorem" (K. Arrow 1955) I supported with arguments, that through "a simultaneous, reflective, strong effective (Pareto), Flexible, fair (Rawls), collective (Amartya Sen) Social Welfare Function (SWF) in the frame of a General Equilibrium (Walras), incompatibilities that incorporate the values of equality, justice, harmony, symmetry, and the hypothesis, of self-organization (Papakonstantinidis) as well as the hypothesis of self-supporting bargaining solution in a community level, should exist and be the only one: the win-win-win equilibrium Win-win-win papakonstantinidis situation is proposed as an extension of both “non-cooperative game” and the principal–agent problem (also known as agency dilemma or theory of agency) under the constrains put by the five theorems Especially, Pareto efficiency , as an economic state where resources are allocated in the most efficient manner Pareto efficiency is obtained when a distribution strategy exists where one party's situation cannot be improved without making another party's situation worse. Pareto efficiency does not imply equality or fairness. Also known as "Pareto optimality” (INVESTOPEDIA) Also, the theory of justice focus on the "veil of ignorance", along with the original position, is a method of determining the morality of a certain issue (e.g., slavery) based upon the following thought experiment: parties to the original position know nothing about their particular abilities, tastes, and position within the social order of society. When such parties are selecting the principles for distribution of rights, positions, and resources in the society they will live in, the veil of ignorance prevents them from knowing about who they will be in that society. The question in which the paper gives answers is if it possible and how to focus on social welfare (as the Arrow’s (1951) “Impossibility Theorem” today disputed. We believe that the proposed (from the present work) and routed (by the original applications in the Greek countryside) "win-win-win papakonstantinidis model" (since 2002), succeeds in "passing" of economic forms, and giving a welfare’s perspective